Money, money, money … at the Industrial Court?

Damien Kiethan
Partner at Raj, Ong & Yudistra

Background: Abba’s Money, Money, Money:

Money, money, money

Must be funny

In the rich man’s world 

Money, money, money

Always sunny

In the rich man’s world

Aha

All the things I could do

If I had a little money

It’s a rich man’s world

On 6.6.2023, the Court of Appeal in ACE Holdings Sdn Bhd v Norahayu Bt. Rahmad & the Industrial Court of Malaysia held that the Industrial Court has the power to hear unfair dismissal cases that seek only money; and not reinstatement. 

The Industrial Court does not lose its jurisdiction to hear a case simply because an Employee does not seek to be reinstated to his/her former position. Moreover, allowing pure monetary claims to be made at the Industrial Court would reduce the workload of Civil Courts; and protect Employees’ interests and livelihood.

This case involved a claim at the Industrial Court by Norahayu bt. Rahmad (“Norahayu”), a former Vice-President of ACE Holdings Bhd (“Employer”). Norahayu decided not to seek reinstatement of her job from her Employer in the Industrial Court:

  • Consequently, the Industrial Court held that it does not have jurisdiction to hear and decide on Norahayu’s case. Because, the remedy of reinstatement was not sought. 
  • However, the High Court quashed the Industrial Court’s decision; and held that the Industrial Court cannot dismiss Norahayu’s claim simply because she did not ask for reinstatement. The High Court’s decision was then affirmed by the Court of Appeal.

TLDR: There is no need for Employees to seek for reinstatement of their jobs anymore, if they intend to bring their claims before the Industrial Court. Employees can seek for monetary claims, alone.

Related

Legal Audits (Vol 3, Pt 6) – Disputes and Law

Patrick Lim Partner at Raj, Ong & Yudistra Today we look at the last two focus clauses when reviewing legal contracts – dispute resolution and governing law clauses. It goes without saying that while we have discussed the types of clauses to focus on during a legal contract audit, there

Read More »

AI vs Copyright: Who Owns the Rights To ChatGPT Content

Yu Jian OngCivil litigator, corporate & commercial lawyer and business legal adviser Unless you’ve been living under a rock, you’ve surely heard of ChatGPT. You’ve probably used ChatGPT for work, school, research or content creation. I’m pretty certain that 86.7% (I used my own AI called GuesstimationGPT to derive this

Read More »

Company Law 101: Minority Protection

Nurul Hanani A.Legal Associate In Malaysia, minority shareholders have legal remedies available to them when their rights as shareholders are infringed upon by the majority shareholders or the directors of a company.  Two common legal remedies available are the Minority Oppression Suit and the Derivative Action. While both legal remedies can be used to

Read More »
Scroll to Top