Photo credit to Penrose.law

Company Law 101: Minority Protection

Nurul Hanani A.
Legal Associate

In Malaysia, minority shareholders have legal remedies available to them when their rights as shareholders are infringed upon by the majority shareholders or the directors of a company. 

Two common legal remedies available are the Minority Oppression Suit and the Derivative Action. While both legal remedies can be used to protect the rights of minority shareholders, they differ in their nature and the circumstances under which they can be filed.

Minority Oppression Suit

A legal remedy available to minority shareholders who have suffered oppression or unfair prejudice from the actions of the majority shareholders or the directors of a company. Minority oppression occurs when the majority shareholders or directors of a company abuse their power and authority to the detriment of the minority shareholders. 

Examples:

Exclusion of minority shareholders from important decisions, mismanagement of the company’s affairs, and financial impropriety.

Section 346 of the Companies Act 2016:

Brought by a minority shareholder against the company or its directors if they can show that their rights as shareholders have been unfairly prejudiced or that the affairs of the company have been conducted in a manner oppressive to them.

Reliefs that may be ordered: the winding up of the company, the purchase of shares by the company or the majority shareholders, or the appointment of a receiver or manager to manage the affairs of the company.

Derivative Action

A legal remedy available to directors or shareholders (“complainant”) to enforce a right of action belonging to the company. This legal remedy is available where the directors of a company have breached their duties to the company, but have failed to take appropriate action to remedy the breach. In this case, a complainant may bring a derivative action on behalf of the company to recover damages or seek injunctive relief against the directors.

Section 347 of the Companies Act 2016: 

if they can show that the directors of the company have acted in breach of their fiduciary duties owed to the company. 

Reliefs that may be ordered: the recovery of damages or the imposition of injunctions against the directors.

Related

Legal Audits (Vol 2, Pt 1) – Risk Mitigation

Patrick Lim Partner at Raj, Ong & Yudistra In the last volume of this series, we explored the benefits of carrying out legal contract audits as well as the steps of carry one out. In this article, we take some time to look at the risks for not carrying out

Read More »

Demystifying “dupes”.

Nurul Hanani A.Legal Associate Some of you may have been eyeing a particular item, from a particular brand. Unfortunately, such an item is beyond your tax bracket. So, what choice do you have other than to resort to a cheaper alternative? (Fret not, I believe a lot of us are

Read More »
Scroll to Top