Photo by Joshua Hoehne on Unsplash

Trust Protectors in Malaysia

Patrick Lim
Partner at Raj, Ong & Yudistra

As the name suggests, a protector appointed under a trust is usually charged with protecting the integrity of the trust as well as the stakeholders thereunder. In Malaysia, this role is rarely encountered or used.

While the Labuan Trust Act provides a detailed explanation of the function of a protector under Labuan’s offshore jurisdiction, the Trustee Act and Trustee Corporation Act, which apply to the mainland jurisdiction of Malaysia, do not expressly define the term “protector.”

Generally, a protector can be described as a person who holds various powers within the trust. These powers can range from positive powers, such as the ability to appoint trustees or make changes to the trust instrument, to negative powers or veto powers, where the protector can prevent the trustees from exercising certain powers without their consent. In Malaysia, the protector (or protectors) derive their power from the provisions of the trust instrument.

The specific role of a protector will vary depending on the trust instrument and the intentions of the settlor. Some examples include appointing new trustees, adding or removing beneficiaries, making amendments to the trust instrument, or changing the governing law of the trust.

When it comes to the fiduciary duties of a protector, Malaysian legislation does not specifically address this aspect. Whether a protector’s role is considered fiduciary in nature depends on how the trust instrument is constructed and interpreted. In other jurisdictions, it has been established that protectors have a legal obligation to act in the best interests of the beneficiaries and are prohibited from using their powers for personal gain.

If used correctly, the role of the protector provides a strong system of checks and balances to the trust and may provide structured longevity to the tenure of a trust.


How do I make sure I get paid – Debt prevention 101

Patrick Lim Partner at Raj, Ong & Yudistra Debt collection. Some will say it is the bread and butter of quite a few litigation law firms. It is also the one component of running a business that could be the difference between sustainability and total ruin. Sounds dire. In line

Read More »

Legal Audits (Vol 3, Pt 4)

Patrick Lim Partner at Raj, Ong & Yudistra Thus far in this third volume of articles for our Legal Audits series, we have looked at 4 types of clauses that should be included during any contract review or audit. In this article, we take a look at two other types

Read More »

Legal Audits (Vol 2, Pt 2) – Examples

Patrick Lim Partner at Raj, Ong & Yudistra Failing to conduct regular contract audits can expose a company to a variety of risks, as outlined in our previous article. These risks can include non-compliance with laws and regulations, disputes over the terms of contracts, inefficiency or ineffectiveness in contracting, and

Read More »
Scroll to Top